缅北强奸

Change of Address
Changing Research Supervisor
Direct Transfer into the PhD Program (PhD Fast-Tracking)
Failure in a Graduate Course
Laboratory Safety听触听Leaving 缅北强奸
CIVE 701 Ph.D. Comprehensive Examination - Procedures
CIVE 702 Ph.D. Research Proposal Examination - Procedures
Requesting a leave of absence
Research Progress Tracking
Vacation Policy
Withdrawal from a Degree Program听听

听

---

Change of Address

In the event that you change your address during the course of your studies (sessional or permanent address) you should do the following:

• Change your address on MINERVA
• Notify the Departmental Graduate Program Coordinator (gradinfo.civil [at] mcgill.ca)
• Notify Payroll, 688 Sherbrooke West, 15th Floor (only necessary if you are being paid by 缅北强奸, e.g. teaching assistantships, research assistantships).

Changing Research Supervisor

听Once a working relationship with a supervisor has been established, a student may feel it necessary to request a change of supervisor. Reasons for requesting such a change include:

• a change in the direction of his/her research;
• a sudden loss of funding;
• conflict or incompatibility.

Changing one鈥檚 research supervisor in any circumstance is a serious step and should only be undertaken if the student believes that the change is truly in his/her best interest. The following questions should be considered in the case of conflict of incompatibility:

• Has the student tried discussing the problems/situation with the supervisor?
• Has the student tried informal conflict resolution?
• Have the discussions about the problems been sufficiently clear? Do both the student and the supervisor agree that there is a problem?
• Have the student and the supervisor tried to remedy the problem?
• Has the student sought advice from trusted colleagues and friends?
• Has the student discussed the circumstances with the Graduate Program Director and/or Department Chair?
• Has the student discussed with the supervisor (and/or Graduate Program Director/Department Chair) the implications of changing supervisor?
• Has the student considered who else in the department will have the knowledge, experience, time, interest and funding to supervise him/her?
• Has the student discussed changing supervisor with this prospective supervisor? Has he/she expressed an interest in supervising the student鈥檚 research? Is he/she willing to fund the student?

Student鈥檚 responsibilities when changing supervisor

While students do have the right to change supervisors, they also have certain responsibilities:

• It is the responsibility of the student to provide sound reasons for requesting the change of supervisor.
• It is the responsibility of the student to find a replacement supervisor, although the Graduate Program Director or Department Chair is expected to provide assistance, where necessary.
• Once the student has found a replacement supervisor, he/she must inform the original supervisor in a timely fashion of his/her intention to leave, especially if the student is involved in ongoing research. It is important to be professional: the supervisor may have to find someone to replace the student and should be given a reasonable amount of time to find such a replacement before the student leaves.
• It is the student鈥檚 responsibility to return any equipment, data, and resources that were entrusted to him/her by the original supervisor. The student must also ensure that the original supervisor鈥檚 intellectual property rights are respected within his/her new project.

Supervisor鈥檚 responsibilities

• The supervisor is expected to treat the student鈥檚 request for a change of supervisor in a professional manner.
• Supervisors are expected to guide their advisees through to final completion of their program, provided that the student鈥檚 documented performance remains satisfactory.听 However, in some cases, a supervisor may decide to terminate the relationship (for instance, if an insoluble conflict develops).听 If this occurs, the supervisor, in consultation with the GPD, must ensure that the student will have continuous supervision for the remainder of his/her program and that funding commitments will be respected.

Departmental responsibilities

• Units must establish in writing clear procedures for dealing with changes of supervision and ensure that the resulting document is made available to students.
• When the supervisor terminates the supervisory relationship, the department is responsible for assigning a replacement supervisor and ensuring that initial funding is maintained (if guaranteed in the department鈥檚 offer of admission).

Administrative procedure

If a student wishes to change his/her supervisor, the following procedure is to be followed:

1. The student should first discuss the issue with his/her current supervisor. The GPD may serve as a conflict mediator if necessary.
2. If the current supervisor agrees to the change, the student then finds a new supervisor who is willing to supervise him/her.
3. Once the choice has been made, the current supervisor sends an email to the GPD indicating that s/he is withdrawing as the student鈥檚 supervisor. At the same time, the new supervisor sends an email to the GPD indicating his/her willingness to supervise the student.
4. The Graduate Program Coordinator then makes the official request to the Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies Office (GPSO).
5. Two possible results: a) GPS approves the change and amends the student鈥檚 record accordingly; b) GPS denies the request, at which point the GPD will be required to write a letter of explanation (this is rare).

听

---

Direct Transfer into the PhD Program (PhD Fast-Tracking)

The fast-track route to a PhD degree is aimed at students who have demonstrated a superior record in the undergraduate program, and who would benefit from a faster progression through graduate studies.

MSc听students may apply for fast-tracking to the Ad Hoc Graduate Admissions Committee (appointed by the Chair). The student will have to satisfy the following requirements:

• Not more than 16 months of study in the MSc Program have elapsed
• Completion of course work requirements of the Master鈥檚 degree
• Minimum grade of A- in graduate courses
• GPA for each of the last 2 years of undergraduate study >- 3.5
• Letter of support from the current research supervisor
• Two additional letter of reference (excluding co-supervisor if any)
• Submission of an application outlining the reasons and full justification for entry to the PhD program. The application will also include a preliminary research proposal.

The Committee will review the application to judge the likelihood of successful completion as a PhD thesis. Following acceptance by the Committee, the student will proceed with the standard PhD preliminary oral examination, which must be scheduled within 6 months.

If the student passes the preliminary oral examination (CIVE 701), they will be transferred to the PhD program at the level of PhD II. Should the student fail听the preliminary examination, they may continue at the Master鈥檚 level.

听

---

Failure in a Graduate Course

Students who have failed one course required in their program of study may automatically retake that or an equivalent course.听 A student with any further failures in that course, or a failure in any other course, will be required to withdraw from their program of study.听 This policy does not pertain to the failure of comprehensive examinations, doctoral oral defenses, or thesis failures.听 PhD students and Master鈥檚 students in thesis programs can also be required to withdraw from their program of study for documented lack of performance in research. Passing at the undergraduate level does not constitute a pass at the graduate level in 500 level courses. See GPS - Failure Policy.

听

When you have completed your stay at 缅北强奸, you are required to sign and submit to the Administrative Officer a clearance form听to ensure return of keys, termination of computing codes, return of library books, transfer of relevant documents and data to your supervisor, etc. The form can be obtained from the Graduate Program Coordinator.

Timeline

Following entry into the program and within 13 months, this oral examination is held to determine if the candidate has the required background and the potential to succeed in the Ph.D. program. The examination is administered as course CIVE 701 and registration should take place in the semester in which the oral examination is to be scheduled.

The minimum course requirements must have been completed before the CIVE 701 examination is taken.

Aims and Objectives

1. The examination is usually the first formal oral examination faced by the candidate in which the student is asked to develop critical thinking.
2. The examination is comprehensive. Thus, the questioning not only relates to the candidate's specific research area, but seeks to ensure that the student has knowledge and understanding of a broader nature affecting the discipline and profession (taking into consideration the candidate's educational background and research area).
3. The candidate, through questioning by a committee of examiners with differing backgrounds, will be made aware of strengths and weaknesses in order to improve their background knowledge.

Composition of the Examination Committee

1. Chair of the Department or alternate (Chair of the Committee)
2. Research Director (and co-supervisors)
3. One member from the University with a similar field of interest to the students
4. One member from the Department with a similar or related field of interest to the student

The committee is nominated by the Research Director in consultation with the student and with the approval of the Graduate Program Director or the Chair of the Department.
听

Methodology

1. The candidate should distribute to the members of the committee, two (2) weeks prior to the examination, a written literature review, which should be a maximum of 5000 words long, not including a reasonable number of figures and the references. The text should be typed single-spaced, in a single column format and a 11 pt font. It should have 3 sections as follows:
   
   1.听Introduction
   2.听Literature Review (comprehensive, critical and which identifies knowledge gaps)
   3.听(Optional) Theory
   听
2. At the beginning, the candidate will be invited to present orally the salient features of their literature review in 15-20 minutes.
   听
3. A 60-minute period of questions on matters related to the literature review will then follow.
   听
4. Topics considered to be open for examination include the following:
   
   a) Fundamental courses that are related to the broad area of research.
   b) Fundamental aspects of graduate courses taken by the candidate.
   c) Current activities in the practice of the candidate's chosen field.
   d) Any topic in which the aim of the questioning is to discover the candidate's way of thinking and approach to problem solving.
   听
5. It is not assumed that the candidate will be able to cope with every question. It should be clear to all that a searching examination must at times go beyond the candidate's capacity.
   听
6. The candidate will be judged on the basis of their written submission, their oral presentation, their response to questioning and on their overall performance in the program to date for their suitability to continue their studies toward the Ph.D. degree. The result of the examination is reported on a PASS/FAIL basis.
   听
7. a) A PASS is required to continue to the Ph.D. Research Proposal Examination CIVE 702.
   
   b) In the event that the student is judged to have failed the CIVE 701 Ph.D. Comprehensive Examination, the student is permitted one repeat within a minimum of four (4) months and a maximum of six (6) months. After the first failure, a grade of HH (which designates 鈥渃ontinuing鈥�) will be recorded on the student鈥檚 transcript. The student is informed in writing by the department that he/she has failed the comprehensive and is informed of the conditions relating to a repeat of the examination, including the nature of the re-examination and the committee membership, as well as the deadline for retaking the exam. The student may also be informed of further requirements in the event of failure, e.g., the taking of an additional course or courses in areas where they have shown weakness in the comprehensive^*.
   
   c)听If the student does not repeat the exam by the deadline specified, the HH grade will be converted into F and the student will be withdrawn from the university. In the event that the repeat comprehensive is judged to have been failed, the student will receive a grade of F and will be withdrawn from the university^*.

*Approved by Executive of Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research (FGSR) Feb. 17, 1997 and Council of FGSR March 7, 1997; Revised by GPS July 9, 2014, June 29, 2015, and June 14, 2017.

听

---

CIVE 702 Ph.D. Research Proposal Examination - Procedures

Timeline

Following entry into the Ph.D. program, and within 16 months (or within 3 months following CIVE 701 in the case of a successful repeat of this exam), this oral examination is held to determine if the candidate may continue in the doctoral program and if the proposed research project has the potential to lead to successful completion of a Ph.D. thesis.

The examination is administered as course CIVE 702 and registration should take place in the semester in which it is to be scheduled.

Aims and Objectives

1. The examination is the second formal oral examination for the Ph.D. student in which the student is asked to develop critical thinking.
2. The examination is comprehensive. Thus, while the main focus of the questioning relates to the candidate's proposed research project, it also seeks to ensure that the student has knowledge and understanding of a broader nature in their research area and as applied to the profession (taking into consideration the candidate's educational background). The proposed research project is assessed to determine its scope, its feasibility and its potential for an original contribution.
3. The candidate, through questioning by a committee of examiners with differing backgrounds, will be made aware of strengths and weaknesses in order in order to improve their proposed research project and their background knowledge of their research area.

Composition of the Examination Committee

The composition of the committee should be the same as that for the student鈥檚 CIVE 701 exam:

1. Chair of the Department or alternate (Chair of the Committee)
2. Research Director (and co-supervisors)
3. One member from the University with a similar field of interest to the students
4. One member from the Department with a similar or related field of interest to the student

The committee is nominated by the Research Director in consultation with the student and with the approval of the Graduate Program Director or the Chair of the Department.
听

Methodology

1. The candidate should distribute to the members of the committee, two (2) weeks prior to the examination, a written research proposal, which should be a maximum of 5000 words long, excluding a reasonable number of figures and the references, typed single-spaced, in a single column format and 11 pt font. It should have six (6) sections and one appendix as follows:

   1. Introduction
   2. Summary of the literature identifying the knowledge gaps and a review of any new literature published since the CIVE 701 examination was passed
   3. Description of the research project and its objectives
   4.Description of the research methodology, mathematical models, analytical or numerical solutions methods, etc. as appropriate.
   5. Preliminary results (including validation of methods or models) (if available - not mandatory).
   6. Expected original research contributions
   7. Schedule of the research program with steps and timeline
   Appendix: Literature review document submitted for the CIVE 701 examination.

2. At the beginning of the oral examination session, the candidate will be invited to present the salient features of their research proposal in 15 to 20 minutes.
   听
3. A 60- to 75-minute period of questions on matters related to the research proposal will then follow.
   听
4. Topics considered to be open for examination include the following:
   
   a) Topics relevant to the research proposal either directly or indirectly.
   b) Engineering fundamentals related to the student鈥檚 broad research area and from relevant graduate courses taken by the student.
   c) Current activities in the practice of the student's chosen field.
   d) Relevant topics in which the aim of the questioning is to discover the student's way of thinking and approach to problem solving.
   听
5. It is not assumed that the examinee will be able to cope with every question. It should be clear to all that a searching examination must at times go beyond the candidate's capacity.
   听
6. The student will be judged for their suitability to continue their studies towards the Ph.D. degree on the basis of the following: i) the quality of the written research proposal and its oral presentation, ii) their response to questioning, iii) their overall performance in the program to date, iv) the scope and feasibility of the proposed research, and v) the potential for original contributions.. The result of the examination is reported on a PASS/FAIL basis.
   听
7. a) A PASS is required for the Ph.D. candidate to continue in the program.
   
   b) In the event that the student is judged to have failed this comprehensive examination, the student is permitted one repeat within a minimum of four (4) months and a maximum of six (6) months. After the first failure, a grade of HH (which designates 鈥渃ontinuing鈥�) will be recorded on the student鈥檚 transcript. The student is informed in writing by the department that he/she has failed CIVE 702 and is informed of the conditions relating to a repeat of the examination, including the nature of the re-examination and the committee membership, as well as the deadline for retaking the exam. The student may also be informed of further requirements in the event of failure, e.g., the taking of an additional course or courses in areas where they have shown a weakness in understanding^*.
   
   c) If the student does not repeat the exam by the deadline specified, the HH grade will be converted into F and the student will be withdrawn from the university. In the event that the repeat comprehensive is judged to have been failed, the student will receive a grade of F and will be withdrawn from the university^*.
   听

*Approved by Executive of Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research (FGSR) Feb. 17, 1997 and Council of FGSR March 7, 1997; Revised by GPS July 9, 2014, June 29, 2015, and June 14, 2017.

听

---

Requesting a leave of absence

听This procedure is administered by the Office of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies. A formal request must be filed: see GPS Leave of Absence.听

听

---

Research Progress Tracking

All graduate students working towards a thesis degree must comply with the mandatory research progress tracking procedure established by the Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies Office (see University Policy).

Research progress tracking reports are due in the Winter semester on the Monday following the Study Break. Blank report forms will be e-mailed to students in mid February. Electronic versions (scanned with signatures) shall be e-mailed to gradinfo.civil [at] mcgill.ca. The reports are reviewed by the Graduate Program Director and students are notified by e-mail if any follow-up action is required.

The following steps must be followed for each graduate student in a thesis program:

1. At the end of their first semester, thesis students and their supervisor(s) must agree on and provide a written statement of specific academic (coursework) and research objectives/expectations for the year on Form #1 (Graduate Student Research Objectives Report Form).听 For returning students, Form #1 is to be filed yearly with the rest of the research progress tracking report.
2. At least once a year, and until the thesis is submitted, the student and supervisor(s) must review the progress that has been achieved toward the recorded objectives.听 The student should record his/her accomplishments and progress for the year by completing Form #2 (Graduate Student Research Progress Record).听 This completed form is then evaluated by the supervisor(s)听 on Form #3 (Graduate Student Research Progress Report Form).听 All parties sign Form #3.听 A student who does not agree to sign the form must write a statement detailing his/her objections.
3. In the event that recorded research progress is unsatisfactory, a new set of objectives should be developed for the student and recorded on Form #1.听 These new, or interim, objectives apply only to the next semester.听 Evaluation of progress should take place after that semester has concluded, following the steps described in point 2, above.
4. In the event that a student has any two unsatisfactory evaluations, they may be required to withdraw from their program of study.听 These two unsatisfactory evaluations need not be successive.
5. All forms are to be kept in departmental files.听

听

---

Vacation Policy

Graduate students should normally be entitled to vacation leave equivalent to university holidays and an additional total of fifteen (15) working days in the year. Funded students with fellowships and research grant stipends taking additional vacation leave may have their funding reduced accordingly. Notify your supervisor(s) a few weeks ahead of time when planning a vacation or an absence exceeding 3 days.
听

---

Withdrawal from a Degree Program

Candidates whose work is considered by the Department to be unsatisfactory may be asked to withdraw.

Any student who decides to withdraw from the university must first consult the University Policy on Withdrawal. An online withdrawal form is accessible at /students/records/univw.

听