The contributions of Sir William Osler, MDCM 1872, are legendary. Canadian-born and 缅北强奸-trained, he was one of the most influential physicians in the world in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. He helped champion a scientific reform of medical education, lay the groundwork for bedside teaching, and was a pioneering advocate of patient-centred care before the term existed. His Principles and Practice of Medicine was the landmark medical textbook of his day, and he was one of the four founding professors of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine. Over 200 obituaries paid tribute to him when he died in 1919.
A century later, a motion from the 缅北强奸 Medical Students鈥� Society (MSS) expressed concern that Osler, one of the Faculty鈥檚 best known and most celebrated alumni, harboured racist and sexist beliefs. It encouraged 鈥渟elf-reflection about the way Sir William Osler is glorified and how his name is uncritically used.鈥�
The motion spawned a symposium, 鈥淧erspectives on Sir William Osler in the 21st Century,鈥� to examine the questions about Osler under an academic light. Although initially delayed due to the onset of the pandemic, it was held February 3, 2021, attracting a broad audience from the 缅北强奸 community and beyond.
At 缅北强奸, Osler鈥檚 name is ubiquitous: it鈥檚 inscribed on a Parks Canada plaque outside the McIntyre Medical Building, itself located on Promenade Sir-William-Osler. McIntyre, in turn, is the permanent home of the Osler Library of the History of Medicine, which was created as the result of a legacy gift by Osler and which consists of works that lay the intellectual foundations of medicine. The Library is also where, at his request, his ashes rest. There is an annual Osler Day at 缅北强奸; an essay award and mentoring groups are named for him; and, thanks to another bequest by a contemporary, William Grant Stewart, MDCM 1888, a copy of his 1913 Yale lecture entitled A Way of Life has been distributed to medical students every year since the late 1920s. And it goes on.
Osler Head Librarian Dr. Mary Hague-Yearl noted at the symposium that, while at 缅北强奸, Osler founded both the graduate student society and the MSS, and helped develop what is now the Maude Abbott Medical Museum, which features specimens he collected in his time as a pathologist at the Montreal General Hospital. He used the $600 he earned working in the smallpox ward (where he caught the disease) to buy microscopes for his students.
There are other accounts of his life that are more contentious.
An incident raised repeatedly during the symposium was the drafting of Professional Notes, a fictitious report Osler penned under a pseudonym as a practical joke on his rival Dr. W.A. Molson. In it, he uses such words as 鈥渓udicrous,鈥� 鈥渄isgusting鈥� and 鈥渧ile animal habit鈥� to describe the sexual and obstetric practices of Indigenous peoples. Also at issue, the skulls of four Indigenous people that Osler took abroad, where they were added to a former teacher鈥檚 collection. He served as vice-president at a eugenics conference, stating his hatred for Latin Americans, and reportedly told a female medical student on her first day at Johns Hopkins to 鈥済o home.鈥� (Hague-Yearl told FMHS Focus after the symposium that the student used this story 鈥渢o recount how indebted she was to him for his unwavering support of her during her time at the university.鈥�)
In 1914, speaking about the Kamagata Maru, a ship of Indian would-be immigrants who were denied entry into Canada, Osler asked rhetorically, 鈥淲hat are we to do when the yellow and brown men begin to swarm over?鈥� and added later: 鈥淲e are bound to make our country a white man鈥檚 country.鈥�
Some argue that Osler was a man of his age, and that those statements, especially in light of the good he did, cannot be fairly judged through our modern lens. Others disagree, notably symposium panelist Samir Shaheen-Hussain, MDCM鈥�03, PGME鈥�09, author of聽Fighting for a聽Hand to Hold: Confronting Medical Colonialism against Indigenous Children in Canada. 鈥淲ere colonizers or slave owners in North America simply men of their age? What about the colonized and enslaved who fought to end their oppression?鈥� he asked.
缅北强奸 Anatomical Pathology resident Andr茅 Lametti, MDCM鈥�20, who had been part of the MSS when the Osler motion was passed, also suggested shifting perspectives, asking what today鈥檚 鈥淚ndigenous communities, whose ancestors鈥� skulls were taken as collectors鈥� items, would have to say?鈥�
Shaheen-Hussain,聽who is also聽an assistant professor in the Department of Pediatrics in the Division of Emergency Medicine at 缅北强奸 and a pediatric emergency physician, said that Osler could have challenged his prejudices with actions, such as speaking out against the segregated wards at Johns Hopkins.
Panelist Dr. Nadeem Toodayan, a physician-trainee from Brisbane, Australia, and foundation member of the William Osler Society of Australia & New Zealand,聽cited letters of praise for Osler from physicians of various backgrounds, including Malayan-born Chinese physician, Dr. Wu Lien-The, who popularized face masks during the 1911 Manchurian plague, and Dr. John Andrew Kenny Sr., a prominent African-American surgeon, who helped found the National Medical Association. Following a stay in Egypt, Osler wrote glowingly of the Islamic religion. Hague-Yearl shared that Osler called nationalism 鈥渢he greatest curse of humanity.鈥�
Toodayan maintained that Osler may have regretted his infamous remarks about making Canada a white man鈥檚 country. He quoted Osler鈥檚 correspondence from the following day to a friend: 鈥淲e colonials occupy rather an anomalous position here in the political world.鈥� He added that Osler would later admit to a propensity for speaking out of turn, describing himself as the possessor of a 鈥渨ild and wagging tongue that has often gotten me into trouble.鈥�
The panelists made a range of suggestions. There was a call for more nuance by some as well as to treat this as a cautionary tale鈥攖hat we should be wary of deifying ordinary humans in the university context. Others echoed a suggestion made in the original MSS motion that we broaden our focus to honour a more diverse set of historical figures.
Following the symposium, David Eidelman, MDCM鈥�79, Vice-Principal (Health Affairs) and Dean, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, struck a task force to re-examine the Faculty鈥檚 approach to naming and commemorating achievements and milestones, which will have as its mandate to identify opportunities for improvement in these practices, including the commemoration of groups and individuals who have been overlooked in the past.